Skip to content

Charts

Diagnostic charts

The figures that answer “is this model or process sane?”. As with every family: LUC renders, it does not estimate.

Time-series diagnostics

The lag correlations are computed by the caller and the significance band is drawn at the half-width the caller supplied — no sample size, no band.

Autocorrelation

Autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation over one axis; both series draw a stem from zero.

±1.96/√n shown as a shaded band.

Partial autocorrelation

The partial autocorrelation alone, for reading against the panel on the left.

±1.96/√n shown as a shaded band.

Survival and risk

The step is mandatory: survival is constant between events, so interpolating between two estimates would invent a risk the sample does not have.

Survival curves

Censoring marks are supplied points, never inferred from the data.

Ranking and model quality

Two machine-learning diagnostics: one measures ranking quality, the other measures each feature's direction and uncertainty.

Precision–recall

Recall on x, precision on y; the dashed line is the caller's no-skill prevalence.

A dashed line marks the no-skill prevalence.

Feature importance

Ranked horizontal bars; `signed` colours by coefficient direction, and the intervals are the caller's too.

Scientific correctness

These charts will not do the statistics on your behalf.

Lag correlations, survival estimates, precision and recall, feature importances and their intervals are all drawn exactly as supplied. Binning, fitting, resampling and correction happen where the data lives, which is what stops the picture and the report from disagreeing.

Luc UI v1.0Diagnostics, ML & riskdark theme